Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Mesorat%20hashas for Yoma 95:12

בעי רב פפא

Is his hand to be compared to the neck of the animal<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' When the blood flows from the neck of the animal to the pavement, instead of being received in a vessel, it is invalidated. Does the same law apply when the incense is scattered?');"><sup>12</sup></span> so that the incense would be invalidated, or is it to be compared to a ministering vessel and thus is not invalidated? - The question remains unanswered. R'Papa asked further: If, in taking the handfuls of the incense, he had an [unlawful] intention,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' An intention at the moment of slaying to eat of the flesh beyond the allotted time renders the animal in question 'a vile thing' (Zeb. 25a) . If the priest has similar intention, i.e., to offer up the incense tomorrow instead of today, would the same consequence ensue for the incense?');"><sup>13</sup></span> what then? Do we say that we infer [the meaning] of 'full' [by analogy of] 'full' occurring with the meal-offering,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra p. 223.');"><sup>14</sup></span> [viz. ,] as in that case an [unlawful] intention effects an invalidation, so here too, an unlawful intention will effect an invalidation, or is it not so? -R'Shimi B'Ashi said to R'Papa: Come and hear: R'Akiba added [the cases of]<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. Hag. 23b, Sonc. ed., for notes.');"><sup>15</sup></span> the fine flour, the incense, the balm, and the embers [of the sanctuary]. that if a tebul yom<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' One who has bathed in daytime but must await the sunset to be perfectly clean. V. Lev. XXII, 7.');"><sup>16</sup></span> had touched part of them, he invalidated all of them.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The vessel of ministry combining the various constituent parts of the flour etc., as one. V. Hag., Sonc. ed., ');"><sup>17</sup></span> Now the assumption is that since a tebul yom invalidates them '<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Through the union effected by the vessel of ministry.');"><sup>18</sup></span> so does their being kept overnight,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In virtue of the fact that they were contained in a vessel of ministry. V Me'il. 10a.');"><sup>19</sup></span> and since their being kept overnight invalidates them, so does unlawful intention.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., since the incense by being placed in a vessel of ministry received a holy character in respect of contact with a tebul yom, and being kept overnight, it becomes invalidated through unlawful intention.');"><sup>20</sup></span> R'Papa asked:

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Yoma 95:12. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.

Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse